Keywords AI

Aider vs Sourcegraph Cody

Compare Aider and Sourcegraph Cody side by side. Both are tools in the Coding Agents category.

Quick Comparison

Aider
Aider
Sourcegraph Cody
Sourcegraph Cody
CategoryCoding AgentsCoding Agents
Websiteaider.chatsourcegraph.com

How to Choose a Coding Agents Tool

Key criteria to evaluate when comparing Coding Agents solutions:

IDE integrationWhich editors and IDEs are supported — VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim, etc.
Autonomy levelAutocomplete vs chat-assisted vs fully autonomous code generation and execution.
Codebase awarenessHow well the tool understands your full project context, not just the current file.
Language supportQuality of suggestions across your primary programming languages.
Privacy and securityWhether code leaves your machine, data retention policies, and enterprise controls.

About Aider

Aider is an open-source terminal-based AI pair programming tool that edits code directly in your local git repository. It creates proper git commits, supports all major LLMs, and can work across multiple files simultaneously. Aider is popular with developers who prefer terminal workflows over IDE extensions.

About Sourcegraph Cody

Cody is Sourcegraph's AI coding assistant that understands your entire codebase. It uses Sourcegraph's code graph to provide context-aware code completions, explanations, and refactoring across massive codebases. Cody supports multiple LLM backends and works in VS Code, JetBrains, and the web.

What is Coding Agents?

AI-powered developer tools that can write, review, debug, and refactor code—ranging from IDE copilots to fully autonomous software engineering agents.

Browse all Coding Agents tools →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a coding agent?

A coding agent is an AI tool that helps write, debug, review, and refactor code. They range from autocomplete tools to fully autonomous agents that can implement entire features, run tests, and submit pull requests.

Will coding agents replace developers?

No, but they significantly increase developer productivity. Coding agents handle routine implementation and debugging, freeing developers to focus on architecture, design decisions, and complex problem-solving.

How do I choose between GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Claude Code?

GitHub Copilot is best for inline autocomplete and broad IDE support. Cursor provides the deepest codebase-aware chat experience. Claude Code excels at autonomous multi-file tasks from the terminal. Many developers use multiple tools.

Other Coding Agents Tools

More Coding Agents Comparisons