Keywords AI
Compare Arthur AI and Lasso Security side by side. Both are tools in the AI Security category.
| Category | AI Security | AI Security |
| Pricing | — | Enterprise |
| Best For | — | Enterprises that need to monitor and secure AI interactions |
| Website | arthur.ai | lasso.security |
| Key Features | — |
|
| Use Cases | — |
|
Key criteria to evaluate when comparing AI Security solutions:
Arthur AI provides an AI firewall and monitoring platform.
Lasso Security provides cybersecurity for large language models, protecting enterprises from LLM-specific threats. Their platform monitors and secures LLM interactions, detecting prompt injection, data leakage, and unauthorized access patterns. Lasso provides visibility into how AI is being used across the organization and enforces security policies.
Platforms focused on securing AI systems—prompt injection defense, content moderation, PII detection, guardrails, and compliance for LLM applications.
Browse all AI Security tools →The primary risks are prompt injection, data leakage, jailbreaking, and hallucination. Each requires different mitigation strategies.
If your LLM application handles sensitive data or is user-facing, yes. Basic input validation is not enough — LLM attacks are sophisticated and evolving. Dedicated tools stay updated against new attack vectors and provide defense-in-depth.