Keywords AI
Galileo AI vs Weights & Biases
Compare Galileo AI and Weights & Biases side by side. Both are tools in the Observability, Prompts & Evals category.
Quick Comparison
| Category | Observability, Prompts & Evals | Observability, Prompts & Evals |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Best For | AI teams who need to measure and improve the quality of their LLM outputs | ML engineers and researchers who need comprehensive experiment tracking |
| Website | rungalileo.io | wandb.ai |
| Key Features |
|
|
| Use Cases |
|
|
When to Choose Galileo AI vs Weights & Biases
- Monitoring LLM output quality
- Detecting and preventing hallucinations
- Evaluating RAG pipeline accuracy
- ML experiment tracking and comparison
- Model training run management
- Team collaboration on ML projects
About Galileo AI
Galileo is a data intelligence platform for AI that helps teams evaluate, debug, and improve LLM applications. It provides metrics for hallucination detection, context adherence, chunk quality, and response completeness. Galileo's guardrails can be deployed in production to catch quality issues in real-time.
About Weights & Biases
Weights & Biases (W&B) is the leading experiment tracking and ML operations platform, now extended to LLM applications. W&B Traces provides observability for LLM pipelines, while W&B Weave offers evaluation and production monitoring. The platform also supports model training tracking, hyperparameter sweeps, and artifact management, making it a comprehensive MLOps solution.
What is Observability, Prompts & Evals?
Tools for monitoring LLM applications in production, managing and versioning prompts, and evaluating model outputs. Includes tracing, logging, cost tracking, prompt engineering platforms, automated evaluation frameworks, and human annotation workflows.
Browse all Observability, Prompts & Evals tools →