Keywords AI
Compare Lasso Security and Prompt Security side by side. Both are tools in the AI Security category.
| Category | AI Security | AI Security |
| Pricing | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Best For | Enterprises that need to monitor and secure AI interactions | Enterprise security teams who need comprehensive protection for all generative AI usage |
| Website | lasso.security | prompt.security |
| Key Features |
|
|
| Use Cases |
|
|
Key criteria to evaluate when comparing AI Security solutions:
Lasso Security provides cybersecurity for large language models, protecting enterprises from LLM-specific threats. Their platform monitors and secures LLM interactions, detecting prompt injection, data leakage, and unauthorized access patterns. Lasso provides visibility into how AI is being used across the organization and enforces security policies.
Prompt Security provides enterprise GenAI security across the entire AI stack. Their platform protects against prompt injection, data exfiltration, harmful content, and shadow AI usage. It works as a transparent proxy for all LLM traffic, enabling centralized security policy enforcement without changing application code.
Platforms focused on securing AI systems—prompt injection defense, content moderation, PII detection, guardrails, and compliance for LLM applications.
Browse all AI Security tools →The primary risks are prompt injection, data leakage, jailbreaking, and hallucination. Each requires different mitigation strategies.
If your LLM application handles sensitive data or is user-facing, yes. Basic input validation is not enough — LLM attacks are sophisticated and evolving. Dedicated tools stay updated against new attack vectors and provide defense-in-depth.