The AI landscape has reached a pivotal moment with the release of GPT-5 and Claude Sonnet 4. Both models represent significant leaps forward, but choosing between them isn't straightforward. After extensive testing and analysis, here's your comprehensive guide to making the right choice.

Quick summary: which should you choose?

Choose GPT-5 if you need:

• Superior mathematical reasoning and complex problem-solving
• Cost-effective solution for high-volume usage
• Best-in-class multimodal capabilities
• One-shot coding with comprehensive solutions

Choose Claude Sonnet 4 if you need:

• Massive context windows (1M tokens vs 400K)
• Precise, iterative coding workflows
• Superior safety and transparency features
• Free tier access for experimentation

---

Performance benchmarks

Mathematical reasoning

The difference in mathematical capabilities is substantial:

Real impact: GPT-5's mathematical superiority translates to better performance in scientific computing, financial modeling, and complex logical reasoning tasks.

Coding performance

Both models excel at coding, but with different strengths:

Multimodal capabilities

---

Technical architecture: two different philosophies

GPT-5: unified dynamic routing

GPT-5 employs a sophisticated routing system:

• gpt-5-main: Fast responses for simple queries
• gpt-5-thinking: Deep reasoning for complex problems
• Dynamic optimization: Automatically balances speed vs quality
• Reasoning levels: Minimal, low, medium, high

Claude Sonnet 4: constitutional AI approach

• Transparent reasoning: Users can see decision-making process
• Extended thinking: Up to 24-hour autonomous work sessions
• 1M token context: 5x larger than GPT-5's 400K limit
• Safety-first design: Constitutional AI principles embedded

Context window comparison

---

Cost analysis: GPT-5 delivers major savings

Base pricing comparison

Hidden costs and optimizations

Claude's cost-saving features:

• 90% prompt caching discount ($0.30 vs $3.00)
• 50% batch processing savings
• But: 16-30% more tokens due to tokenization inefficiency

GPT-5's advantages:

• More efficient tokenization
• Volume discounts through Azure AI Foundry (up to 60% off)
• Cheaper variant models (GPT-5-mini, GPT-5-nano)

Real-world cost example

For a typical enterprise processing 100M tokens monthly:

---

Real-world developer experiences: what users say

Insights from Hacker News discussion

Recent developer feedback reveals nuanced preferences:

GPT-5 Strengths (Developer Reports):

• "GPT-5 understood what to do immediately" for complex C# optimization
• Better cross-file reasoning and project-wide understanding
• More complete, production-ready code generation
• Superior architectural decision-making

Claude Sonnet 4 Strengths:

• Faster iteration cycles for code refinement
• More precise, "surgical" edits with minimal collateral changes
• Better at following specific instructions and constraints
• Preferred for incremental development workflows

Developer feedback & real-world usage

Key insights from community

GPT-5: Better for complex debugging, architectural decisions, and complete feature implementation Claude Sonnet 4: Preferred for iterative refinement, large codebase analysis, and precise edits

Tool integration performance

---

Quick decision matrix

When to choose each model

---

Enterprise trends

Current market:

• 37% of enterprises use 5+ AI models
• Claude: 42% market share in coding
• GPT: Leading multimodal applications
• 75% budget growth enables multi-model strategies

Deployment pattern:

---

Performance metrics

Speed comparison

---

Getting started

Using Keywords AI playground to compare GPT-5 and Claude Sonnet 4